Black Crawling Systems Archive Release 1.0/Black Crawling Systems Archive Release 1.0 (L0pht Heavy Industries, Inc.)(1997).ISO/tezcat/Beter/Beter19

Internet Message Format | 1996-07-07 | 43KB

From the Radio Free Michigan archives

ftp://141.209.3.26/pub/patriot

If you have any other files you'd like to contribute, e-mail them to
[e-mail].
------------------------------------------------

Hello, my friends, this is Dr. Beter. Today is December 18, 1976, and
this is my monthly AUDIO LETTER(R) No. 19.

As our Bicentennial Year of 1976 draws to a close, the United States
of America is in grave danger. Our economy is ravaged by the twin
plagues of high inflation and high unemployment, a condition which I
named STAGFLATION some years ago. Our Republic is under attack in a
far-advanced plan to bring our country under dictatorship. Our very
lives are under the threat of extinction in a surprise nuclear attack
which would be the beginning of NUCLEAR WAR ONE; and all of these
terrible things have been brought about deliberately by a handful of
ruthless, powerful men here and abroad, bent on world domination.

"But how can this be?", you ask. "How can so few people control the
destinies of all the rest of us?"

After all, it is easy to imagine how far our Secret Rulers and their
henchmen would get if they tried to take over even one city, much less
all of America, with their own bare fists and brute force. They would
be stopped in their tracks in no time flat because everyone
understands that kind of threat and there are far more of us than
there are of them. But those who want to enslave us understand this
all too well; they know better than to try any kind of frontal attack
on us that would be widely understood. Instead, they have perfected
the art of harnessing our own energies so that gradually, step by
step, we are enslaving ourselves under their control.

The Hegelian principle of thesis, antithesis, synthesis is being
applied so as to gradually merge our life with that of the Soviet
Union at every level! The average working man and woman in America
would never knowingly allow this to happen, and yet it is
happening--gradually, year after year.

1. The first step, called Thesis, is to create and publicize a problem
in education, economics, or otherwise in our daily lives. In other
words, where there is peace, create discord and trouble.

2. Step 2, Antithesis, is to create opposition to the problem.

3. The final step, Synthesis, is to offer a so-called solution to the
problem.

This diabolical, roundabout approach psychologically conditions people
to accept things which they would otherwise oppose vigorously. Just a
look around with this in mind, and you will see that this technique is
being used all around you in a thousand ways; but the real key to the
success or failure of this method of manipulating the public lies in
something Abraham Lincoln said over 100 years ago, quote:

"With public sentiment, nothing will fail; without it, nothing can
succeed."

So long as we, the people, are simply told the truth about things,
public sentiment reflects the truth. Under those conditions, real
solutions can be found for real problems to everyone's benefit; but
when we are not told the truth, public sentiment reflects only what we
believe and we can be manipulated into supporting all kinds of things
that are not in our best interest.

Here in the United States a subtle, long-range propaganda
technique--known simply as MISINFORMATION--has been used to build up
an artificial and false picture of the world and our own nation. In
the areas of foreign policy, national security, politics, and
economics, the truth has been suppressed and replaced with an
elaborate structure of lies, distortions, and half-truths. This false
picture has come to be accepted as the truth with the result that the
truth itself has been rendered unbelievable. I don't think anyone in
his right mind could do what has been done to us. Our education, our
CONSTITUTION, our free enterprise system, everything possible has been
perverted in order to confer ever more power on our Secret Rulers.

Now, WAR IS COMING. The wars of this century have been fought far from
our shores, but this time it is coming here--to our land, to our
homes, to our people! It will not be a conventional war but NUCLEAR
WAR ONE. As in all modern wars, it will begin with a surprise attack.
Thanks to the silence of the United States Government and of the
controlled major media, most Americans will be caught completely by
surprise, believing in a lie called detente until thermonuclear
fireballs erupt all around our nation.

To show how different the truth is from what we are led to believe by
our Secret Rulers, I will discuss these three topics today:

Topic #1--WHY THE UNITED STATES WAS NOT FIRST TO LAUNCH AN EARTH
SATELLITE

Topic #2--WHY MOST AMERICANS CANNOT BELIEVE NUCLEAR WAR IS IMMINENT

Topic #3--HOW THE MAJOR TAX-EXEMPT FOUNDATIONS HAVE CLEARED THE WAY
FOR SOVIET NUCLEAR ATTACK.

Topic #1--On the evening of October 4, 1957, Americans were stunned by
the announcement that the Soviet Union had become the first nation in
history to place a man-made satellite in orbit. Sputnik I, weighing
184 pounds, was circling the Earth every hour and a half sending out
beeps that became famous overnight. The world was thrilled, and the
world press heaped great praise on the Soviet Union. They inferred
from this accomplishment that the Soviet socialist system was superior
to our own in scientific and technical progress. It was a historical
first that can never be undone--the Soviet Union had beaten the United
States into space.

Less than a month later Sputnik II was launched. It weighed over half
a ton and carried the first live passenger into space, a dog. The dog
died within a week but it was another startling achievement
nonetheless.

Meanwhile poor old America was struggling along trying to put a tiny
16-pound satellite into orbit by means of the Navy's Vanguard rocket.
Two launches were attempted, but both failed. In one case the rocket
lifted a few feet off the pad only to settle back into a tremendous
fireball as it exploded. It made exciting footage for the television
news that evening. Finally on January 31, 1958, almost four months
after Sputnik I, America launched its first space satellite from Cape
Canaveral, Florida. It was called Explorer I, and it was launched not
by the Navy but by the Army. We were in space at last, but only after
being thoroughly humiliated before the entire world.

After the Sputnik shock, space flight and rockets were suddenly the
"in" thing to be interested in. Even then Senator Lyndon B. Johnson
arranged for a new "Aeronautics and Space Committee" to be set up,
with himself as its Chairman. He was thereafter as visible as possible
in connection with space matters, and today the manned space flight
center in Houston bears his name. At the time, I could hardly imagine
anything more hypocritical for Johnson to do. Even though I was a
lawyer, I had been a member of the then named "American Rocket
Society" for a number of years and had vivid memories of Johnson's
attitude toward space in the early 50's. At that time, four or five
years before Sputnik, I was a member of a group headed by Dr. Wernher
Von Braun who approached Johnson in hopes of obtaining support for a
space program. I'll never forget Lyndon Johnson's reaction to the
whole idea. He did not merely say "No", but jeered at the whole
concept as ridiculous and worthless!

A few years later the United States was deprived of the chance to be
first in space, but not by Lyndon Johnson. What I am going to tell you
does not affect our national security now, but it does provide a
typical example of what has been happening to America for many years.
And as Wernher Von Braun lies on his death bed in a hospital near
Washington, D.C., I believe the time has come for the truth to be told
about why we were not the first to put a satellite into space.

In late 1955 or early 1956, the Joint Chiefs of Staff began the first
act of planning for an American space program. Their goal: To have the
United States initiate the world's first successful space flight at
the beginning of the International Geophysical Year that was to begin
on July 1, 1957. After some controversy as to which Service should
sponsor the space project, it was concluded that the Armywas most
capable of doing the job. This was agreed to and approved by the Joint
Chiefs and by then Secretary of Defense Charles Wilson.

The Army's Redstone Arsenal in Huntsville, Al abama was fortunate in
having the services of the world's foremost rocket expert, Dr. Wernher
Von Braun. From a very early age Von Braun had been fascinated with
the idea of space flight, and he had spent his life working with
rockets. During World War II Von Braun was pressed into service by
Hitler, and the German rocket program was far ahead of other countries
by the end of the war. When the war ended, many of Von Braun's
subordinates at the German rocket base were taken prisoner by the
Soviet Union and it was they who were forced to develop and direct the
Soviet missile and space programs; but Von Braun himself had resolved
well before hostilities ended that he would surrender to the United
States, and he succeeded in doing so. Our Government then prevailed
upon him to enter governmental research where he would have the money
and resources to pursue rocketry in earnest.

When the Earth Satellite project came under consideration years later
in the mid-50's, the Joint Staff project officers interviewed the
Redstone Arsenal officials along with Von Braun himself to ascertain
their capability. Von Braun stated that his group could engineer a
space vehicle and have it ready for orbit in only a few months. The
Joint Staff pushed for the Von Braun project; and after it was
approved by the Joint Chiefs and Secretary of Defense, it went to
President Eisenhower for final approval and allocation of Defense
Department funds--but there it stopped! Strangely there was a long
delay in getting the expected presidential approval. Finally the word
came down to the Joint Staff from the President. Incredibly, they were
to disregard the Army's capability and give the Space project to the
Navy instead. Such a decision was all but unbelievable. The Navy did
not even have a blueprint for such a space vehicle! They would be
starting almost from scratch; but the decision stood, so several large
aircraft companies and Navy scientists gathered to initiate a program
called "PROJECT VANGUARD."

As a direct result of this decision, the Soviet Union was able to put
Sputnik into orbit while the United States was still struggling
unsuccessfully with Vanguard. Joint Staff project officers were most
perplexed about the American political decision to allow the Soviet
Union to beat us in this endeavor when we had the capability to be far
ahead of them. It appeared to follow a pattern of withholding American
capabilities and allowing the Soviet Union the advantage. Later, an
aide to President Eisenhower explained confidentially what had
transpired.

A select group of scientists and financial leaders got wind of the
American space satellite plans at an early stage. The group, headed by
a man who was later awarded the Lenin Peace Prize by the Soviet Union,
went to the President and pressed him to sponsor a purely American
space project with only native Americans working on it. They didn't
want by any means for a former German, such as Wernher Von Braun, to
give the world and future historians the impression that the Germans
of all people were superior in the field of space science. This group,
who were actually doing the bidding of the Rockefellers on behalf of
their Soviet allies, were instrumental in forcing America to take a
back seat in the early years of the Space Age when we were fully
capable of being supreme!

Finally, after two Soviet Sputniks and two humiliating Navy Vanguard
failures, Eisenhower became exasperated and told the Defense
Department to get Von Braun into action. Just six weeks after he
received the go-ahead, Von Braun's Army team launched Explorer I. He
did exactly what he had said he could do two years earlier--and the
very first time he tried it; but the special place in history he so
richly deserved had been denied him forever, just as it had been
denied to the new homeland of his choice, the United States of
America. The anti-German argument that had been used on President
Eisenhower was, of course, a total fraud.

When Sputnik I was launched a short dozen years after World War II,
the Soviet rocket program was even more dependent on the efforts of
captured German scientists than was true in the United States. Thus
only one thing was really accomplished by delaying the Army satellite
effort under Wernher Von Braun: A tremendous propaganda coup for the
Soviet Union and a setback to American prestige and self-confidence
that persisted for years. It is a grim fact that accolades go to the
spoilers and traitors among us, but no acclaim to our true heroes and
men dedicated to American principles.

Under the enthusiastic leadership of Wernher Von Braun the United
States was able to come from behind to win the race to the Moon, but
soon the world press will have relegated him to the footnotes of
modern history. Like General Douglas MacArthur, Wernher Von Braun will
"just fade away."

Topic #2--When Secretary of Defense James Schlesinger was fired by
President Ford just over a year ago in November 1975, he said, quote:

"Some years from now someone will say, 'Why weren't we warned?' and I
wanted to be able to say: 'Indeed you were.'"

But most Americans when reminded of this parting statement by
Schlesinger tend to be surprised. It is as if his words have gone out
into thin air, leaving no lasting impression at all. This is a perfect
illustration of the way in which the American public have been left
comfortably asleep by the controlled major media of our country,
oblivious to the steadily mounting threat of war.

Around the world the alarms of impending nuclear disaster are jangling
louder and louder; but these alarms are muted, muffled, and silenced
by the time they reach you. When isolated facts about American or
Soviet military developments are reported, it is done in such a way
that it has little lasting impact on most people. Thus, for example,
you may hear a news item concerning the debate over the new B-1 Bomber
which the United States Air Force is developing. Taken in isolation
you may well wonder what all the shouting is about and, for that
matter, why such a new bomber is even being considered in this age of
missiles. Or you may hear a brief news item mentioning that the Air
Force wants to buy some F-15 Fighters to augment our air defense
system.

Perhaps these things would make a little more sense to you if you knew
that the Soviet Backfire Bomber began to be deployed operationally
over three years ago! The Backfire is a supersonic long-range bomber
capable of delivering nuclear weapons to targets here in the United
States--and that, my friends, is precisely its purpose, not the
so-called peripheral missions mentioned by some. Knowing this, perhaps
it would have struck you as a little strange that in 1974 after the
Soviet Backfire Bomber began being deployed, the United States
virtually dismantled its air defense system. At the very time that a
renewed Soviet bomber threat was developing, our network of
interceptors was reduced to just six active Air Force Squadrons plus
six more in the Air National Guard! The extensive network of Nike
Hercules Antiaircraft Missiles under Army command was shut down
completely. But now, with war threatening to break out, the Defense
Department is reversing its position on air defense without telling
you why.

The mounting controversy over the relative military strength of the
Soviet Union and the United States has taken many people by surprise.
Almost 3-1/2 years ago the warning was sounded that the Soviet Navy
had become stronger than the United States Navy. That's what the
world's foremost naval authority, Jane's Fighting Ships, said in July
1973; but if you saw this reported at all by the major media, did it
make any impression? Or consider the matter of long-range ballistic
missiles. Over four years ago on November 27, 1972, the Soviet Union
successfully test-fired a submarine-launched ballistic missile with a
range of 4,500 miles! By comparison, the most advanced American
sub-launched missiles have a range of less than 3,000miles. In
addition, the development of a whole new series of Soviet missiles was
underway.

Early this month the Soviet Union began a 20-day period of tests of
the new submarine-launc hed SSNX-18 Ballistic Missile, firing them
into a circular zone 100 miles in radius in the North Pacific
southeast of the Aleutian Islands. The SSNX-18 now has a multiple
warhead capability; and these tests, which are full-operational tests,
extend over the full range of the missile which is now more than 5,000
miles! Particular attention is being given to warhead performance in
these test-proving flights. If all goes as planned, the SSNX-18 will
be committed to full production and operational status within a year's
time. The SSNX-18 will give the Soviet Union a commanding lead over
the United States in the realm of submarine-launched ballistic
missiles. But what have you learned from network news reports or other
major media about this missile? Practically nothing.

But the most tortured reasoning I have seen yet appeared on December
6, 1976, in the New York Times. An editorial on that date entitled:
MOSCOW'S SUBMARINE MIRV begins with the incredible words, and I quote:

"The Soviet Union's first successful test of a submarine-launched
ballistic missile armed with MIRV multiple nuclear warheads is good
news paradoxically for the United States and the world."

The editorial then argues, in effect, that since this will eliminate
the one remaining missile advantage held by the United States, it
opens the door for the Soviet Union to make concessions in SALT
negotiations that could prevent either side from acquiring a
first-strike capability.

Such Alice-in-Wonderland reasoning may still serve the purpose of
lulling millions of Americans back to sleep, but it would not sit well
these days with most NATO Defense Ministers. For the first time many
officials of NATO are generally alarmed by the continuing relentless
build-up of Soviet power in Europe where the best Soviet troops are
concentrated.

For example, consider Denmark which sits astride the channels which
lead from the Baltic Sea to the North Sea. Soviet activity in the
Baltic has grown more and more ominous of late. Early in September a
Soviet task force suddenly materialized off the southeast coast of
Denmark, then left, then reappeared. All kinds of Soviet naval war
games are now being carried out practically on Denmark's doorsteps so
close that they could suddenly turn into attack that would give
practically no warning. Danish Foreign Minister K. B. Andersen said
recently,

"I'm astonished at what is going on. This is completely contrary to
the expectations created by the Helsinki agreement."

And yet our kept press would have you believe that the new Soviet
SSNX-18 missile I just told you about is unimportant or even good
news, because of possible agreements the Soviet Union might make about
it.

At the NATO Defense Ministers' meeting in Brussels earlier this month,
Admiral Sir Peter Hill-Norton of Britain warned that the trend of the
military balance between East and West is continuing to move in favor
of the Soviet bloc. He declared that more money and better planning
are needed if NATO is to match what he called the "relentless
determination" of the Warsaw Pact countries to achieve military
superiority. He warned that NATO can no longer rely indefinitely upon
the superiority of Western technology because massive Soviet spending
on research and development have resulted in vast improvements in
Soviet weapons.

As Dutch Defense Minister Vredeling said on December 8, the day after
Sir Peter's speech, quote:

"The situation as far as the balance of forces world-wide is more
serious than many people think."

And there are many other examples of genuine alarm at the
vulnerability of Western Europe to a devastating surprise attack.

What did Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, who was and is a CIA
operative, have to say to the NATO ministers? He gave a brief nod to
the wide-spread concern over the Soviet build-up, but what you heard
reported in the news emphasized the following, and I quote:

"I think the alliance is healthy. I leave my post as Secretary of
Defense next month with a good deal of optimism about the Atlantic
alliance--the fact that it survived some 26 years; the fact that it's
working, I think reasonably smoothly at the present time; frankly
reassured by the fact that there is an Atlantic alliance, that it's on
watch and doing its job."

And so, my friends, we can all go back to sleep, comfortably
reassured.

Topic #3--One week from today will be Christmas 1976. On that day most
Americans will be celebrating the birth of our Lord Jesus Christ by
giving gifts to one another. The joy of giving is something most
everyone understands to a greater or lesser extent. When presents are
opened on Christmas Day, for example, parents of small children
usually get their greatest fun out of watching their children open
presents, not from opening their own gifts.

In the same vein, people usually feel good about it when they give a
portion of what they have to help others or to support a worthy cause.
This is the foundation of what is known as charity--but unfortunately
there are always a very few among us who are motivated not by a spirit
of sharing but by runaway greed. Their only pleasure in life comes
from amassing more and more of this world's wealth for their own
coffers and extending their power to control the wealth of others as
well. Ultimately those who are motivated this way reach the point
where they have so much wealth and so much power that it is no longer
enough just to add to it just still further. The only thing left in
life for those who have acquired wealth and power through greed is to
use that power and that wealth to play with the lives and destinies of
people. In short, they try to play 'God'.

You may ask: Why would the Soviet Union go to war? Would the
super-wealthy of America want to create a dictatorship here with
themselves in control? You might as well ask: Why does the mountain
climber want to climb the highest mountain? Common answer is: Because
it's there--just like the United States, the richest country in the
world, is there. What a prize.

Early in this century a systematic long-range program was begun by a
small group of immensely powerful people. The goal of this program was
to acquire ever greater control over American society. This was to
lead ultimately to America's merging into a One-World Government with
themselves and their heirs in control.

The method by which this would be accomplished was the dismantling of
the basic structure of American society and its reconstruction in the
image desired by those who had decided to play 'God'. And to carry out
this long-range program, powerful tax-free Foundations were
established and given the halo of philanthropy. They were explained to
the public as simply a special means the wealthy had devised for
giving to the public at large. Each Foundation was thus given the
image of an institutional Santa Claus.

Instead of questioning what they did, the American people were led to
accept their activities in the confident belief that they were just
showering wonderful gifts on our society day in and day out. This is
the picture that is still accepted as the truth by most Americans.
They believe it just as fervently as millions of small children
believe in Santa Claus. The raw truth about this network of
Foundations may therefore sound unbelievable--just as it sounds
unbelievable to a small child if he is told there is no Santa Claus.

For months now I've been referring to the role that has been played by
these Foundations in undermining American society and placing us in
the extreme peril we now face. Now I have been given permission to
reveal one of my primary sources of information about these
Foundations, and to repeat for you his own words about them. He is my
friend Mr. Norman Dodd. Mr. Dodd was Director of Research of the
special committee of the United States House of Representatives to
investigate tax-exempt Foundations in 1953 and 1954. The late
Congressman Carroll Reece of Tennessee was chairman of this very
important committee.

Recently Mr. Dodd gave a rare speech here in Washington, D.C., and he
has given permission to repeat it here for you. I will now be quoting
him.

-------------------

" This is not going to be a speech. This is a sharing of ideas born of
experience, and I'd like to begin by qualifying myself in your minds.

I am a product of a strange type of education and schooling. The
education of which I am a product featured the importance of the
question 'WHY?' and then went on to try to instill in us the
importance of the question plus our responsibility as individuals to
find the answers. I happen to have taken this education and schooling
seriously and I have lived accordingly.

In this schooling to which I was subjected, great stress was laid upon
the history of this country to illustrate the feature I have just
mentioned. As a result I participated in and was witness to something
in the nature of a discovery--which was that in the 200 years of our
history many more truths made themselves self-evident than motivated
our Founding Fathers. One of these truths bears heavily upon the
experiences that I shall recite to you.

The truth, were it to be put in words, would read something like this.
I'll repeat it slowly because it is quite significant and deserving of
considerable thought:

The condition or state of the members of any nation at any given time
reflects the use to which the wealth they have produced is being put
by others than the ones who played a part in its production.

That brings me to two experiences which I will describe to you.

The first was my response to an invitation from the president of the
FORD FOUNDATION in his offices in New York. His name: Rowan Gaither.
Upon arriving there I was greeted with the following:

'Mr. Dodd, we invited you to come because we thought that perhaps, off
the record, you would be kind enough to tell us why the Congress is
interested in the operations of Foundations such as ourselves.'

Before I could think how best to reply, he volunteered this:

'Mr. Dodd, we operate here under directives which emanate from the
White House. Would you like to know what the substance of these
directives is?'

My answer was: 'Yes, Mr. Gaither, I would like very much to know.'
Whereupon he said:

'The substance of the directives under which we operate is that we
shall use our grant-making power so to alter life in the United States
that we can be comfortably merged with the Soviet Union.'

Needless to say, I nearly fell off the chair. As soon as I could
recover myself to reply, I said:

'Mr. Gaither, legally you are entitled to use your grant-making power
for this purpose, but I don't think you are entitled to withhold this
information from the American people to whom you are beholden for your
tax exemption. So why do you not tell the American people what you
have just told me?'

His answer was:

'Mr. Dodd, we would not think of doing that.'

That was one experience that was very informative. It was incredible;
nevertheless, it is the truth.

The next experience involved the acceptance of an invitation from the
CARNEGIE ENDOWMENT FOR INTERNATIONAL PEACE. This invitation came in
response to a letter which I had written the Endowment asking a few
pertinent questions. By 'pertinent' I mean that they related to the
effort of the Congress to determine if Foundations were engaged in
what the Congress said could be 'un-American activities', without
defining 'un-American.' I arrived at the office of Dr. Joseph Johnson,
who was then president of the Endowment. He was the successor to Alger
Hiss. Present were two vice-presidents, relatively new men, and
counsel (a partner in the law firm of Sullivan and Cromwell). After
amenities, Dr. Johnson opened the conversation this way:

'Mr. Dodd, we have received your letter. We can answer the questions
but it will be a great deal of trouble. The reason for its being a
great deal of trouble is that with the ratification by the Senate of
the United Nations treaty, our task was done; and so we bundled up
everything in the way of records and sent them to the warehouse, and
adopted a policy of constructing a building across the street from the
United Nations which will serve as a facility for the benefit of those
many organizations which from this point on will be bound to follow
the activities of the United Nations. So we have a counter suggestion
which is as follows:

If you can spare a member of your staff and send him to New York for
two weeks, we'll provide a room in our library and also make available
to him the Minute Books of this corporation from its inception.'

My first reaction was that he had lost his mind. I had some suspicion
of what these Minute Books might well contain; but here was counsel
and there seemed to be no disagreement on the part of the
vice-presidents--and all of them were relatively young, so my guess
was that none of them had ever read the Minutes themselves. As a
result, I accepted the invitation and did send a member of my staff to
New York. That member brought back to me on dictaphone belts the
following:

We are now back to roughly 1908 when the Trustees raised the question,
asking themselves:

(1) Is there any way known to man more effective than war, assuming
they wish to alter the life of an entire people?

They discussed this question academically and in a scholarly fashion
for almost a year, and came up with the conclusion that WAR is the
most effective means known to man, assuming that objective.

Then they raised question No. 2:

(2) How to involve the United States in a war?

This was in 1909. I doubt if there was any subject more removed from
the minds of the people in this country at that time than the
possibility of involvement in war. There were intermittent shows, you
will remember, in the Balkans; and my guess is that not many people in
the country even knew where the Balkans were. They answered the
question this way:

'We must control the diplomatic machinery of the United States.'

That brings up question no. 3, which is:

(3) How do we secure control of the diplomatic machinery of the United
States?

and the answer comes up:

'We must control the State Department.'

That fits in with prior findings which we had uncovered; namely, that
the hand of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace inside the
State Department was a fact.

Finally, we are in a war. These Trustees have the brashness to
congratulate themselves on the wisdom and validity of their original
decision because already the impact of our participation in World War
I has indicated its capacity to alter our national life. They even go
so far as to word and dispatch a telegram to President Wilson,
pressuring him to see to it that the war does not end too quickly!

Finally, the war is over. The Trustees then take up the problem which
they face: namely, of preventing, as they put it, a reversion of life
in the United States to what it was prior to 1914. They came up with
the conclusion that:

To gain that end, we must control education in the United States.

They realize this is a prodigious piece of work so they seek and
obtain the assistance of the ROCKEFELLER FOUNDATION. They then divide
the task into parts, giving to the Rockefeller Foundation the
responsibility of altering education as it pertains to domestic
subjects. They retain for themselves the task of altering our
education as it pertains to subjects bearing on our international
relationships. Then they decide together that the key to this is an
alteration in the teaching of American history, so they approach three
of the then existing prominent historians with the proposition that
they alter the manner in which, up to then, they had presented the
subject. They are all turned down flat.

They then decide that it is necessary for them to build their own
stable of historians. They approach the GUGGENHEIM FOUNDATION, which
specializes in the awarding of fellowships, and suggest: When we
discover a likely young person who is studying and looking forward to
becoming a teacher of history, we will take him to London to pursue
his studies. So they take 20 to London, and these 20 are briefed in
what is expected of them. These 20 return and eventually become the
most active influence in the American Historical Society.

This coincides with the appearance which perhaps you will remember of
bo ok after book the contents of which cast aspersion on the Founders
of this country, cast aspersion on the ideas which prompted the
founding of this country, and relegates them to the realm of myth!

Finally toward the end of the 1920's the Endowment grants the American
Historical Society $400,000 for the sole purpose of rendering a report
as to what the future of this country promises to be and should be!
This appears in seven volumes. The seventh volume, of course,
summarizes the contents of the other six, and it ends on this note:

'The future belongs to collectivism administered with characteristic
American humanitarianism and efficiency.'

Well, in essence this was the whole story written down; and Mr. Reece
who was chairman of the investigation--the last investigation of
Foundations--hoped to be able to accomplish this. He was not able to
do this owing to the disinterest on the part of the committee's
counsel and the violent activities of one of its members. I might
mention that that member whose activities barred the way was none
other than Wayne Hays--who has come to the end of his career, although
this marked the start of it."

-------------------

Mr. Dodd concluded his talk with some additional comments which I want
to save for another discussion, since they go beyond the subject of
Foundations alone. But you may want to replay what I have just recited
from his speech, noting carefully how different the truth is from
appearances. And remember, the truth has many enemies!

And so it is that the 20th Century has been an unparalleled era of
increasingly destructive warfare, violence, and terror on a world-wide
scale. By pursuing with relentless determination the goal of merging
the United States into ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT, the Trustees of the key
group of major Foundations have brought us to the threshold of NUCLEAR
WAR ONE--to be waged primarily on American soil.

As I first revealed in monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 12 for May 1976, some
of the present-day Trustees of these Foundations have been awakening
to the threat of a Soviet double cross in the grand plan for world
domination--and last summer this double cross got underway with the
planting of short-range underwater-launch nuclear missiles within the
territorial waters of the United States, as well as of many other
countries. But the world-wide economic and political empire that is
today presided over by the Four Rockefeller Brothers is so huge that
it includes many individuals who still do not believe that any Soviet
double cross will take place, much less that it is already underway.

CHEMICAL WARFARE ALREADY UNDERWAY

For example, last month I reported that 18 Soviet submarines were
deployed along our west coast preparing to inject plutonium particles
into the air on November 20, 1976. And our own EPA--the Environmental
Protection Agency--was cooperating by telling us that on that date a
radioactive cloud from a Chinese atomic test would begin passing over
our west coast, when actually the radioactive cloud from China had not
yet left China's own borders! By interesting coincidence, Russell
Trane, the head of the EPA, arrived in a presumably safe location,
Moscow, on November 19--the day before the plutonium was to be
released by the Soviet subs. With appropriate irony, he arrived there
as head of the United States delegation to the "Soviet-American
Commission for Cooperation in Environmental Protection." Can you
imagine?

The plutonium was released by the subs as scheduled on November 20;
but just as happened when this was done the first time in early
October, unusual weather conditions kept the United States from being
badly contaminated. The plutonium cloud drifted across the upper part
of the United States and had little effect at ground level. But, my
friends, the Soviets never give up.

Five days ago on December 13 I learned that Soviet submarines were
lining up along the northwest coast of the United States for the third
time for this purpose. This time there are 21 submarines loaded with
plutonium poison to inject into our atmosphere. According to my latest
Intelligence sources, 16 are deployed along the coast from Seattle,
Washington to Eugene, Oregon, while five (5) more lie between Eugene
and Eureka, California. All of these are within 20 miles of the
shoreline.

I've already explained in detail the connection between this
radioactive chemical warfare and the Swine Flu hoax being perpetrated
by the United States Government, particularly in monthly AUDIO LETTER
No. 17. Therefore it is significant that the so-called Swine Flu
inoculation program was halted with great publicity two days ago owing
to death and paralysis suffered by many who have taken the vaccine.
This serves to focus the nation's attention once again on the terrible
threat Swine Flu is said to be just at a time when the Soviet
submarines are once again prepared to inject a poison into our
atmosphere that can produce severe flu-like symptoms. It may be that,
as was done the past two times, the Soviet submarines will wait for
another announcement from the United States Government that it will
serve as a cover story, such as a Chinese nuclear test, before
releasing the plutonium into our air. But now they have acquired some
experience and it is possible that they will release the plutonium at
any time.

Meanwhile the build-up for war continues. While the mounting Soviet
threat to Europe is fraying the nerves of NATO Defense Ministers, the
most immediate threat to Europe is once again emerging in the Middle
East. In my monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 6 over a year ago I revealed the
over-all plan that existed at that time for war to begin in the Middle
East. I ask you now to listen to that AUDIO LETTER No. 6 again. All is
nearly ready once again for the long planned war in the Middle East to
be ignited. The Rockefeller oil interests now have gotten most of
their money out of the Arab region. Now the title to all the oil
fields have been sold to the Arabs themselves.

The Middle East war will also leave the United States in an even more
defenseless position that we are now in if the Soviet surprise attack
on our country is allowed to take place.

CONTINUING THREAT OF SOVIET UNDERWATER MISSILES PLANTED WITHIN AND
NEAR UNITED STATES BORDERS

Last month I explained in detail why the underwater missiles that are
being planted along our shores by the Soviet Union are so crucial to
them in their plan to defeat the United States in NUCLEAR WAR ONE, but
I also explained that they are no longer being removed by the United
States Navy.

Since I recorded that tape, 57 more nuclear missiles have been planted
in our own territorial waters. Added to the 36 I mentioned last month,
this brings the total to 93 Soviet missiles in the waters of the
United States including Alaska and Hawaii. In addition, four (4)
missiles still threaten the Panama Canal, and five (5) more missiles
now threaten Canada.

I declared last month that I would no longer reveal the locations of
these missiles unless and until responsible arrangements are made to
inform the public of the deadly threat we are under. Our Secret Rulers
had been using my information from October 1st onward only for their
own benefit--and that is not what it is for.

I intend to continue to hold my silence until action is taken for
everyone's benefit. Nevertheless I am going to make one exception at
this time--it involves Hawaii. World War II began with a devastating
surprise attack on Pearl Harbor, and now no less than nine (9) Soviet
underwater missiles now threaten Pearl Harbor and the Island of Oahu
with the same fate a second time.

I will now give the coordinates for these nine missiles only, in hopes
that this time action will be taken to protect the United States
Pacific Fleet from the attack that could come at any moment. These
coordinates are:

Missile #1: 21 degrees/13 minutes/47 seconds North 157 degrees/46
minutes/28 seconds West

Missile #2: 21-18-37 North, 157-57-21 West

Missile #3: 21-17-31 North, 158- 4-17 West

Missile #4: 21-21-19 North, 158- 9- 7 West

Missile #5: 21-36-12 North, 158-12-48 West

Missile #6: 21-36-33 North, 158-11- 6 West

Missile #7: 21-26-54 North, 157-47-17 West

Missile #8: 21-19-27 North, 157-38-36 West

Missile #9: About 25 miles east of Oahu and 8 miles north of Molokai
at 21-21-13 North, 157-15-26 West.

I continue to hope, my friends, that a war can still be prevented. To
find out what you can do in the event war does come, I suggest you
read issue 135 of McKeever's Multinational Investment and Survival
Letter, 1012 Russell St., Baltimore, MD 21230, but my prayer is that
you will never need that kind of information.

Until next month, God willing, this is Dr. Beter. Thank you, and may
God bless each and every one of you.
------------------------------------------------
(This file was found elsewhere on the Internet and uploaded to the
Radio Free Michigan site by the archive maintainer.

 All files are ZIP archives for fast download.

 E-mail [e-mail])